新一代的后台服务中间件都用Go语言写了(上一代的才是Java),比如etcd,那么基于etcd写一个分布式,还是很实用的,废话不多说,先看代码:
- package distribution_locker
-
- import (
- "context"
- clientV3 "go.etcd.io/etcd/client/v3"
- "log"
- "os"
- "time"
- )
-
- type DistributionLocker struct {
- config clientV3.Config
- client *clientV3.Client
- lease clientV3.Lease
- leaseGrantResp *clientV3.LeaseGrantResponse
- leaseId clientV3.LeaseID
- keepRespChan <-chan *clientV3.LeaseKeepAliveResponse
- keepResp *clientV3.LeaseKeepAliveResponse
- txnResp *clientV3.TxnResponse
- ctx context.Context
- cancelFunc context.CancelFunc
- }
-
- // New 创建一把锁
- // etcdEndpoints etcd连接信息,示例:[]string{"localhost:2379"}
- // connectionTimeout 连接到etcd的超时时间,示例:5*time.Second
- func New(etcdEndpoints []string, connectionTimeout time.Duration) (locker *DistributionLocker, err error) {
- locker = &DistributionLocker{config: clientV3.Config{
- Endpoints: etcdEndpoints,
- DialTimeout: connectionTimeout},
- }
- if locker.client, err = clientV3.New(locker.config); err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
-
- //上锁并创建租约
- locker.lease = clientV3.NewLease(locker.client)
- // 第2个参数TTL,可以用于控制如果当前进程和etcd连接断开了,持有锁的上下文多长时间失效
- if locker.leaseGrantResp, err = locker.lease.Grant(context.TODO(), 3); err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- locker.leaseId = locker.leaseGrantResp.ID
- // 创建一个可取消的租约,主要是为了退出的时候能够释放
- locker.ctx, locker.cancelFunc = context.WithCancel(context.TODO())
-
- if locker.keepRespChan, err = locker.lease.KeepAlive(locker.ctx, locker.leaseId); err != nil {
- return nil, err
- }
- // 续约应答
- go func() {
- for {
- select {
- case locker.keepResp = <-locker.keepRespChan:
- if locker.keepRespChan == nil || locker.keepResp == nil {
- // 正式环境把这行代码注释掉,就可以避免对正常日志的干扰了
- log.Printf("进程 %+v 的锁 %+v 的租约已经失效了", os.Getpid(), locker.leaseId)
- return
- } else { // 每秒会续租一次, 所以就会收到一次应答
- // 正式环境把这行代码注释掉,就可以避免对正常日志的干扰了
- log.Printf("进程 %+v 收到自动续租应答 %+v", os.Getpid(), locker.keepResp.ID)
- }
- }
- }
- }()
- return locker, nil
- }
-
- func (locker *DistributionLocker) GetId() int64 {
- return int64(locker.leaseId)
- }
-
- // Acquire 获得锁
- // lockerId 锁ID,推荐使用UUID或雪花算法,确保唯一性,防止复杂业务+大量数据的情况下发生锁冲撞
- // 返回值:who 如果获得锁失败,此ID可以标示锁现在在谁手中
- func (locker *DistributionLocker) Acquire(lockerId string) (who string, ok bool) {
- var err error
- // 在租约时间内去抢锁(etcd 里面的锁就是一个 key)
- kv := clientV3.NewKV(locker.client)
-
- // 创建事务
- txn := kv.Txn(context.TODO())
- // 定义锁的Key
- var lockerKey = "lock:" + lockerId
- // If 不存在 key,Then 设置它,Else 抢锁失败
- txn.If(clientV3.Compare(clientV3.CreateRevision(lockerKey), "=", 0)).
- Then(clientV3.OpPut(lockerKey, lockerId, clientV3.WithLease(locker.leaseId))).
- Else(clientV3.OpGet(lockerKey))
- if locker.txnResp, err = txn.Commit(); err != nil {
- return "", false
- }
-
- if !locker.txnResp.Succeeded {
- return string(locker.txnResp.Responses[0].GetResponseRange().Kvs[0].Value), false
- }
- return "", true
- }
-
- func (locker *DistributionLocker) Release() error {
- locker.cancelFunc()
- if _, err := locker.lease.Revoke(context.TODO(), locker.leaseId); err != nil {
- return err
- }
- return nil
- }
核心思想是:创建一个与etcd的连接,然后在锁释放之间,不断地给锁续命,让它始终有效,和Reddsion一样的。具体地:
下面是测试代码:
- package main
-
- import (
- "distributionLockByEtcd/distribution_locker"
- "flag"
- "fmt"
- "log"
- "os"
- "time"
- )
-
- func main() {
- namePtr := flag.String("n", "", "锁名称")
- flag.Parse()
- if *namePtr == "" {
- fmt.Println("必须指定一个锁名称")
- return
- }
- if locker, err := distribution_locker.New([]string{"localhost:2379"}, 5*time.Second); err != nil {
- log.Fatalf("创建锁失败:%+v", err)
- } else if who, ok := locker.Acquire(*namePtr); ok {
- // 抢到锁后执行业务逻辑,没有抢到则退出
- log.Printf("进程 %+v 持有锁 %+v 正在处理任务中...", os.Getpid(), locker.GetId())
- time.Sleep(20 * time.Second) // 这是正在做的事情,假定耗时20秒
- log.Printf("进程 %+v 的任务处理完了", os.Getpid())
- // 手动释放锁,在后台应用服务中,也可以通过defer释放
- if err := locker.Release(); err != nil {
- log.Fatalf("释放锁失败:%+v", err)
- }
- time.Sleep(5 * time.Second)
- } else {
- log.Printf("获取锁失败,锁现在在 %+v 手中", who)
- }
- }
注意:无论如何,申请锁和释放锁的操作成对出现是个好习惯,只申请不释放的做法不值得提倡。